| 'An
abominable and most detestable crime' |
||||||
| Interior of the URC chapel. Once the galleries were filled with children at crowded services. | ||||||
|
with intent to commit the abominable and most horrid detestable and sodomitical
crime, amongst Christians not to be named, called Buggery with him the said
Joseph Stammers...against the order of Nature then and there diabolically
and feloniously to commit and perpetrate to the great displeasure of Almighty
God, to the great scandal of all human kind, to the evil example of all
others in the like law offending, and against the grace of our said Lord
the king's crown and dignity."Joseph Stammers was similarly charged
and acquitted. And so, surprisingly was Samuel Perry! The clerk to the court
was obviously confused, too. At first, in the court roll, he writes "Jurors
say Guilty". Then he puts an insert mark in the line and writes above
it the word "not" and adds "discharged". That this was
the actual verdict is borne out by a note on the back of the Assize Calendar
(the list of prisoners being tried). It says: "Samuel Perry - -acquitted and discharged." |
||||||
|
SO this couldn't have been the reason Samuel Perry languished in Chelmsford
goal for so long. Was there some later charge? There is no record of one
but in 1794 the Assize Calendar lists the prisoners brought out of Chelmsford
gaol to have their sentences reviewed. And there is Samuel Perry's name.
"Samuel Perry, convicted of a misdemeanour. Let him remain in gaol
for the space of 12 calendar months and once during that time be placed
in and upon the pillory on a market day at Braintree, in this county, for
the space of one hour between the hours of eleven and two in the day." Some day out for poor Rev Perry that must have been, standing there helpless with his arms and head thrust through holes in the planks for every market drunk and passer-by to jeer at him and throw rubbish in his face. At the Lent Assizes they brought him up again, but still the court had no pity: "'Samuel Perry, to remain according to his former sentence." Was the man who had ministered to Wethersfield's dissenting flock for almost thirty years just a sad old man? Or was he a martyr to unjust accusation, used as an excuse to bring him before the court for religious reasons? Most likely the latter. A later minister, Rev Peter Sibree, records in his diary: "Before I left Wethersfield I was witness of the deaths of two of Mr Perry's malicious calumniators, who ended their days in wretchedness and loathsome poverty." Poor unfortunate Rev Perry could well have been the victim of a political fit-up. |
||||||
| Pulpit and organ in Wethersfield United Reformed Church | ||||||
| back | Click
picture to enlarge |
|||||